Final answer:
Thomas can address the counterclaim by acknowledging the different experiences offered by printed books and e-books, while highlighting studies on paper reading comprehension and the long-term benefits of e-book readers.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering a counterclaim that paper books cannot be replaced by e-book readers, Thomas might address it by acknowledging that while technology has revolutionized the way we access and read books, traditional printed books offer a different reading experience that many still prefer. Studies have shown that reading on paper might aid comprehension; a study by Mangen, Walgermo, and Bronnick (2013) indicated that students reading on paper performed slightly better in comprehension exams than those who read the same material on e-books. However, the convenience of e-books and their ability to store multiple titles and grant immediate access cannot be ignored. Although the initial cost of an e-book reader might be higher, the long-term benefits and the potential cost savings on purchasing digital books can be substantial, not to mention the environmental benefits of reducing paper use.