54.4k views
1 vote
In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate many services benefiting the community, including the Children's Story Hour.

Which is a piece of relevant evidence in support of Joshua's claim and reasoning?


A: Without Story Hour, the kids will be getting more TV and less literature.

B: The annual circulation of the library is .5 million volumes. That statistic means that the residents of our city borrowed approximately a half million volumes.

C: Over the years, sitting in a circle with many other children, I must have listened to dozens of wonderful stories and poems.

D: I began attending these weekly events even before I was able to read; I was three or four years old, according to my mother.

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

The answer is A!

Step-by-step explanation:

In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate-example-1
User Owo
by
7.7k points
4 votes
A would be the most relevant because it shows a negative consequence to getting rid of Children's Story Hour.
User Wiktor Walc
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.