86.2k views
2 votes
What does 1a demonstrate about expressions?

2 Answers

3 votes
After all, the numerals in (1a–b) and the numerals in (3a–b) are not plausibly homonyms. ... Co-referringexpressions are often not substitutable, so (5) does no more than further demonstrate the inadequacy of the naïve reference principle.
User Realz Slaw
by
8.6k points
5 votes
Hm,

I think it means 1 multiplied by a random number, or variable in this case.
User Adnauseam
by
8.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories