Final answer:
The question is missing crucial information and is therefore incomplete. It appears to pertain to congruent triangles, but without additional context or details, it's impossible to determine which triangle is congruent to ∃MQN.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to concern the properties of congruent triangles and the transitive property of congruence. However, the question is incomplete as it does not provide enough details or context to accurately determine which triangle is congruent to ∃MQN. In geometry, when you have two triangles with angles and sides that match or "are congruent" (usually marked with the same number of tick marks), you can say they are congruent in their entirety. This is due to congruence postulates like SAS (side, angle, side), ASA (angle, side, angle), and otahers that allow us to establish triangle congruence.
If ∃C ≅ ∃M, ∃E ≅ ∃Q, and corresponding sides are also congruent, then it follows by the postulates that these triangles are congruent. However, without more information, such as which sides of the given angles are congruent or additional congruent angles, it is impossible to complete the statement. To provide an accurate response, the complete information regarding the sides of the triangles in question would be necessary.