164 views
0 votes
Which of the following best compares the Ming and Qing dynasties in China to the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires?

A. The Ming and Qing dynasties were poor, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires grew prosperous through trade.
B. The Ming and Qing dynasties practiced Christianity, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires practiced Buddhism.
C. The Ming and Qing dynasties both created empires using gunpowder weapons, but the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires did not.
D. The Ming and Qing dynasties were more isolated, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires interacted more with neighboring cultures.

User Dannio
by
7.0k points

2 Answers

4 votes
I believe the answer to this is C. C. The Ming and Qing dynasties both created empires using gunpowder weapons, but the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires did not.
User Anand Deshmukh
by
7.1k points
1 vote

Answer:

C. The Ming and Qing dynasties both created empires using gunpowder weapons, but the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires did not.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Ming and Qing dynasties were able to create empires using gunpowder weapons because gunpowder was first developed in China, and from there, it spread to the whole world. However, the Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal empires were also able to control large amounts of people and vast territories through the use of other various weapons.

User ProtoVB
by
7.1k points