369,162 views
1 vote
1 vote
Describe the situation and why you think analytical or Euclidean geometry is more applicable need helps with this homework question

User Dave Hillier
by
3.0k points

1 Answer

25 votes
25 votes

Step-by-step explanation

Since the Euclidean Geometry is the Geometry of the Flat Space, we can affirm that it's in two dimensions, where rotation and similarity make sense.

Although it may be expanded to three-dimensional space and beyond, it is still referred to as flat space. The concept is that all dimensions are equal and that they are equal everywhere in space.

The area of a square created on the diagonal of a rectangle, rectangular parallelepiped, or higher dimensional hyperrectangle is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares built on the mutually perpendicular sides of the rectangle, according to the Pythagorean Theorem.

This is known as Euclidean Geometry. Non-Euclidean Geometry, such as spherical, elliptic, hyperbolic, or relativistic geometry, is distinguished by the fact that the same Pythagorean theorem does not apply (though variations do).

So the true dilemma is when to utilize synthetic geometry instead of analytic geometry. Whenever possible, we could say. The challenge with synthetic geometry is that proofs and constructions frequently need some ingenuity on the prover's side.

User Lakshitha Ruwan
by
3.3k points