1.4k views
0 votes
Look at the maps. The top map shows carbon dioxide released by wildfires. The bottom map shows how the carbon dioxide would have been reduced by prescribed fires. In an essay that talks about ways to reduce carbon dioxide, these maps would most likely be used as evidence to support a claim that prescribed fires are beneficial. a rebuttal against a claim that prescribed fires are beneficial. evidence to support a counterclaim that prescribed fires are not a benefit. a rebuttal against a counterclaim that prescribed fires provide benefits

User Janise
by
6.1k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

The answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason why is because I took the test on Edgenui

User SZL
by
6.6k points
4 votes

The correct answer is A.

The bottom map provides data that shows that prescribed fires would actually reduce the carbon dioxide, as opposed to wild fires, which would produce it in large quantities.

Therefore, these maps could be used as evidence to support the idea that prescribed fires are benefitial for the environment, rather than harmful.

User Arena
by
5.2k points