136k views
3 votes
Read the claim.

Animal testing is unnecessary in this century and should be banned.
Read the counterclaim.
Animal testing has led to important medical breakthroughs.

Which is the best rebuttal to address the counterclaim?

With modern technology, scientists can make advances without involving the one hundred million animals now used each year for animal testing.
With over one hundred years of successful animal testing, it is obvious that the scientific community must go on using animals to continue to be successful.
While it is true that there have been successes in the past with animal testing, that is not necessarily an indicator of what will happen in the future.
While animals have been used for testing throughout history, this does not mean that people should just keep doing that because they are used to it.

User Roheen
by
6.4k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer:With modern technology, scientists can make advances without involving the one hundred million animals now used each year for animal testing.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Cynepnaxa
by
6.2k points
5 votes

With modern technology, scientists can make advances without involving the one hundred million animals now used each year for animal testing.

This option is the best rebuttal because it leaves out subjective reasoning. It also uses numbers to help give the statement more power. Option B is not a good choice because it doesn't actually go against the counterclaim; instead, it supports it. Option C is also not a good choice because it validates the counterclaim and only gives a weak statement of opinion. Option D is also not a good choice because it also only states an opinion rather than any facts.

User Dean Wu
by
6.0k points