Question

Review the passage.

“The Story Hour has been one of our most popular programs,” said Tomlinson. “Reading aloud helps bring literature to life for children, and I’m worried that without Story Hour, the kids will be getting more TV and less good literature.”

Which best evaluates the use of this evidence to support the argument that library funding should not be cut because it provides important services to the community?





This evidence does not support the argument because it addresses the Story Hour, rather than the library itself.

This evidence does not support the argument because it relies on facts and statistics that are not related to the library cuts.

The evidence supports the argument by making an emotional appeal to parents to encourage their children's reading habits once the library has closed.

This evidence supports the argument by giving an example of a library service that has a positive impact upon specific residents of the community.

Answer 1

Yeah it was D, not a

Answer 2

In this passage we are not able to identify that the library funding should not be cut because it provides important services to the community, due to the referred program “The Story Hour” was never linked to the library during the fragment, taking this into account we can say that this evidence does not support the argument because it addresses the Story Hour, rather than the library itself.