58.7k views
3 votes
Does the result of the calculation in question 3 justify your original assumption that all of the SCN^- is in the form of FeNCS^2+

User Trbabb
by
5.8k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

According to Le Chatelier's principle, the removal of SCN⁻ by precipitation with silver nitrate would shift the equilibrium to restore SCN⁻ concentration, also affecting Fe³⁺. The initial assumption that all SCN⁻ is in the form of Fe(SCN)²⁺ can be confirmed by calculations showing that concentrations are consistent with the expected equilibrium constant.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question pertains to a chemical equilibrium system in which there is a reaction between iron(III) ions (Fe³⁺) and thiocyanate ions (SCN⁻) to form the complex ion Fe(SCN)²⁺. The original assumption that all of the SCN⁻ is in the form of Fe(SCN)²⁺ is being questioned based on a calculation from prior information. In this scenario, Le Chatelier's principle is applied: when SCN⁻ is removed due to precipitation with silver nitrate, forming AgSCN(s), the equilibrium shifts to restore some of the SCN⁻ concentration. This shift would also affect the concentration of Fe³⁺, according to the principle. The calculation should justify whether the concentration changes are consistent with the original assumption that all SCN⁻ forms Fe(SCN)²⁺, which would typically be supported by finding that the resulting concentrations conform to the expected equilibrium constant (K), suggesting no excess SCN⁻ was initially present.

User Aj Gu
by
6.8k points
5 votes
Fe 3+ + SCN- --> FeSCN 2+

.......Fe 3+ .......SCN-.........FeSCN 2+
I.......0.04..........0.001..............
C........-x...............-x.............
E.....0.04-x.....0.001-x...........x

Keq = 203.4 = x / (0.04-x)(0.001-x)
203.4 = x / (x^2 - 0.041x + 4x10^-5)
203.4x^2 - 8.34x + 0.00094 = x
203.4x^2 - 9.34x + 0.00094 = 0
x = -0.0001M or 0.0458M
so, using your Keq, there would be no SCN- or Fe 3+ left.....all would be in the form of FeSCN 2+
User Supun Praneeth
by
5.6k points