menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Why are encyclopedias a poor source of primary information? A. They are unreliable. B. They are too broad in their scope. C. They are poorly written. D. They do not have current enough information.
asked
Aug 3, 2018
130k
views
3
votes
Why are encyclopedias a poor source of primary information?
A. They are unreliable.
B. They are too broad in their scope.
C. They are poorly written.
D. They do not have current enough information.
English
high-school
David Poeschl
asked
by
David Poeschl
8.6k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
2
votes
Thinking that the answer is D, they do not have current enough information
Bar Akiva
answered
Aug 8, 2018
by
Bar Akiva
7.5k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.5m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
Passe para a voz passiva: - Kevin asked Dennis a question -Somebody Build the house last year -She gives him a box
Who is the author of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland'??
why is mercury usually hard to see without a telescope?
If you are writing a persuasive essay in favor of banning vending machines in schools, which is a counterargument you might anticipate?
Transforme em voz passiva: They don't speak English in this shop
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org