Final answer:
Burgess's Concentric Zone Model and Hoyt's Sector Model both focus on urban structure, with the CBD as a central point, but differ in how they address transportation's role.
Step-by-step explanation:
Both Ernest Burgess's Concentric Zone Model and Homer Hoyt's Sector Model offer foundational frameworks for understanding urban structure and growth. The fundamental similarity between the two models lies in their attempt to delineate how different urban areas, such as residential, industrial, and commercial zones, are arranged in relation to the central business district (CBD). Burgess conceptualized the city as a set of concentric circles with the CBD at the center, while Hoyt proposed a city developed in sectors emanating from the CBD along transportation corridors. Both models highlight the significance of transportation and the economy in shaping urban form, acknowledging that urbanization and economic activities impact settlement patterns. Furthermore, they both describe a tendency for wealthier residents to live further away from the industrial zones, aligning with the concepts addressed in geography standards WG.6A and WG.6B. Nonetheless, Hoyt's model emphasizes the importance of transportation routes more explicitly.