143k views
5 votes
Identify the similarities between the human settlement models of Ernest Burgess and Homer Hoyt. Give your response in the form of a short paragraph.

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

Burgess's Concentric Zone Model and Hoyt's Sector Model both focus on urban structure, with the CBD as a central point, but differ in how they address transportation's role.

Step-by-step explanation:

Both Ernest Burgess's Concentric Zone Model and Homer Hoyt's Sector Model offer foundational frameworks for understanding urban structure and growth. The fundamental similarity between the two models lies in their attempt to delineate how different urban areas, such as residential, industrial, and commercial zones, are arranged in relation to the central business district (CBD). Burgess conceptualized the city as a set of concentric circles with the CBD at the center, while Hoyt proposed a city developed in sectors emanating from the CBD along transportation corridors. Both models highlight the significance of transportation and the economy in shaping urban form, acknowledging that urbanization and economic activities impact settlement patterns. Furthermore, they both describe a tendency for wealthier residents to live further away from the industrial zones, aligning with the concepts addressed in geography standards WG.6A and WG.6B. Nonetheless, Hoyt's model emphasizes the importance of transportation routes more explicitly.

User Israel
by
8.5k points
7 votes

Between the two models of human settlements of Burgess and Hoyt, there are some differences, and some similarities.

The similarities can be seen in the fact that in both models the Central Business District is located in the central part of the settlement. Another similarity is that the factories/industry are surrounded with the Working Class Housing, though they are constructed differently, and in both models, the Commuter Zone/High Class Housing is set further away from the industry.