184k views
5 votes
What is the missing justification?

transitive property
reflexive property
symmetric property
substitution property

What is the missing justification? transitive property reflexive property symmetric-example-1
User Grigy
by
8.0k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Answer:

∠A ≅ ∠C (transitive property)

Explanation:

Given : Some statements

We have to choose the correct justification for the missing justification from the given options.

Consider ,

Since, given ∠A ≅ ∠C and ∠C ≅ ∠B

then , ∠B ≅ ∠C (BY SYMMETRIC PROPERTY)

Also,

Using transitive property ,

If A= B and B = C then A = C

Thus, ∠A ≅ ∠C and ∠C ≅ ∠B

Then ∠A ≅ ∠C (transitive property)

Thus, m∠A = m∠C (definition of similar triangles.)

User Yarg
by
8.7k points
5 votes

Answer:

Option A is correct.

The missing justification is: Transitive property

Explanation:

Given:
\angle A \cong \angle B ,
\angle C \cong \angle B

Symmetric property of equality states the if for all real values of x , y

if x =y then, y =x.

Then, by symmetric property of equality:

we can write
\angle C \cong \angle B as


\angle B \cong \angle C

Transitive property of equality states that if we have the two things that are equal to each other and the second thing is equal to a third thing.

i.e, if a =b and b =c

then a =c

By transitive property of equality:

if
\angle A \cong \angle B and
\angle B \cong \angle C

then;


\angle A \cong \angle C ......[1]

Congruent angle states that the angles have exact the same measure

Therefore, by definition of congruent angles in [1] we have;


m\angle A = m \angle C

What is the missing justification? transitive property reflexive property symmetric-example-1
User Matan Gubkin
by
7.7k points