Answer:
ASA postulate supports the conclusion that WAS ≅ NOT.
Explanation:
Given in the triangles WAS and NOT,
W = N, S = T, WS = NT
So,
- ∠W ≅ ∠N (Angle)
- ∠S ≅ ∠T (Angle)
- WS ≅ NT (The included side)
According to ASA (Angle - Side(included) - Angle) the two triangles WAS and NOT are congruent.
*As WS and NT are included by the angles so they are congruent by ASA, not by AAS (Angle - Angle - Side(not included))