Answer:
A. by referring to the waugh v. mississippi university case about protests in fraternities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The State had there passed a law banning understudies from quietly amassing in Greek letter crews and giving that understudies who went along with them could be removed from school. This law would show up superficially to cross paths with the First Amendment's [p523] opportunity of get together provision. The law was attacked as violative of due process and of the privileges and immunities clause, and as a deprivation of property and of liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment.
It was contended that the club made its individuals increasingly moral, showed discipline, and inspired its members to study harder and to obey better the rules of discipline and order