Final answer:
The efforts of modern human rights groups in the U.S. differ from those of the Founding Fathers in scope and methods, such as legal challenges and advocacy, aimed at stronger enforcement or recognition of new rights within the established constitutional framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
Comparing the efforts of human rights groups with those of America's Founding Fathers reveals both similarities and differences. The Founding Fathers focused on establishing a system that protected certain inalienable rights and created a framework for democracy. Modern human rights groups generally aim for stronger enforcement of existing laws and sometimes advocate for new rights to address contemporary issues not foreseen by the Founding Fathers, such as digital privacy.
Evaluating the groups' methods in protecting rights involves considering their advocacy, public campaigning, legal strategies, and direct action. These methods are varied and can be highly effective, depending on the political environment and public support. For instance, legal challenges have led to significant changes in civil liberties and civil rights, while public awareness campaigns have shifted societal views and led to legislative changes.
Overall, while the Founding Fathers laid the foundational principles for rights in America, modern groups work within this framework and often use legal and social avenues to expand and enforce these rights. The complexity of contemporary society means that new challenges to civil liberties and civil rights continually emerge, prompting these groups to innovate in their approach to advocacy and protection of rights.