Register

Why have very few planets with low mass (comparable to mars or mercury) been found?

Why have very few planets with low mass (comparable to mars or mercury) been found?
225k views
5 votes
Why have very few planets with low mass (comparable to mars or mercury) been found?

User Saurabh Hirani
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes
because of the fact that low mass planets do not produce large enough radial velocity changes in their stars, they are harder to find.
User Arnaud Nelissen
by
7.8k points
2 votes
Earth because it has so much water come on b
User MuraliKrishna
by
8.1k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

How do you balance __H2SO4 + __B(OH)3 --> __B2(SO4)3 + __H2O
As an object’s temperature increases, the ____________________ at which it radiates energy increases.
Why is gold preferred as a superior metal over silver and bronze?
Link Copied!