Register
Why have very few planets with low mass (comparable to mars or mercury) been found?
225k views
5 votes
Why have very few planets with low mass (comparable to mars or mercury) been found?

User Saurabh Hirani
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

4 votes
because of the fact that low mass planets do not produce large enough radial velocity changes in their stars, they are harder to find.
User Arnaud Nelissen
by
6.5k points
2 votes
Earth because it has so much water come on b
User MuraliKrishna
by
7.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

7.8m questions

10.5m answers

Other Questions

Compare and contrast an electric generator and a battery??
How do you balance __H2SO4 + __B(OH)3 --> __B2(SO4)3 + __H2O
Can someone complete the chemical reactions, or write which one do not occur, and provide tehir types? *c2h4+h2o *c3h8 + hcl *c2h2+br2 *c4h10+br2 *c3h6+br2
As an object’s temperature increases, the ____________________ at which it radiates energy increases.
Why is gold preferred as a superior metal over silver and bronze?
Link Copied!