Final answer:
The problem with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to some individuals, was the belief that it violated states' rights and that the federal government should have limited involvement in civil rights matters.
Step-by-step explanation:
The problem with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 according to some individuals, particularly conservatives who argued for limited federal government powers, was that they believed it violated the principle of states' rights. They argued that the federal government should not interfere in matters that should be left to the states to decide, including civil rights issues. They believed that the act's provisions infringed on the rights of individual states to determine their own laws and policies.
Opponents of civil rights used the argument of states' rights to mask their own racial prejudice, as many of them were unwilling to accept desegregation and equal rights for African Americans. They believed that the federal government should not mandate integration or force private businesses to end discriminatory practices. Some conservatives who supported civil rights, on the other hand, feared that federal interference in these matters would be a violation of the balance of power between the states and the central government.
In summary, the problem with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to some individuals, was their belief that it infringed on states' rights and that the federal government should have limited involvement in civil rights matters.