Final answer:
According to Betty Friedan's framework, the housewife in question is likely experiencing the "problem that has no name," which describes a sense of unfulfillment from being confined to the role of a homemaker. Friedan's work highlighted the myth of universal fulfillment through domesticity and contributed to the rise of the feminist movement.
Step-by-step explanation:
Interpreting the housewife's experience through Betty Friedan's framework, one would say that the housewife is experiencing the "problem that has no name." This term, coined by Friedan in her influential work The Feminine Mystique, describes the sense of dissatisfaction and unfulfillment that many women felt in the role of a homemaker, despite adhering to the societal expectations of marriage, motherhood, and domesticity during the 1950s and 1960s. Friedan's book challenged the notion that all women found fulfillment solely through home and family, revealing that the idealized image of a happy housewife was a myth for many and underscoring the unspoken desire of these women for personal growth and meaningful work beyond the domestic sphere.
Friedan's work had a profound effect on the feminist movement, contributing to its rise and the subsequent formation of organizations such as the National Organization for Women (NOW). The organization, for which Friedan wrote the statement of purpose, aimed to make possible women's full participation in society and to secure equal rights for women. However, Friedan's critique also acknowledged the social and structural barriers that women faced, including the undervaluation of domestic work and the challenges of balancing work with domestic responsibilities, often referred to as the "second shift."