87.9k views
1 vote
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians? A. They can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered. B. They can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived. C. They can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool. D. They can offer historians a firsthand interpretation of an important event.

User Pina
by
5.1k points

2 Answers

5 votes
it is a most likely the first one
User D Whelan
by
6.1k points
4 votes

An advantage that secondary cources have over primary sources for historians is presented in statement A.-They can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered.

User Silvina
by
5.5k points