The answer is "segregation".
A wide range of conviction frameworks and societies exist inside generally social orders. At the point when the general culture grasps the individual societies, it is said to be pluralistic. Along these lines, pluralism can be characterized as keeping up numerous socially and culturally discrete components inside a general public. One gathering will effectively grasp the distinctive components inside their general public (equalitarian pluralism) and other people who will consider pluralism to be corrupting the national culture (inequalitarian pluralism).