81.6k views
2 votes
In Griswold v. Connecticut, on what did justice Goldberg base his concurring opinion

2 Answers

4 votes
By a 7–2 majority, on June 7, 1965 the Supreme Court concluded that the Connecticut statute was unconstitutional. ... Justice Arthur Goldberg wrote a concurring opinion in which he used the Ninth Amendment in support of the Supreme Court's ruling, reasoning that the right of privacy was retained by the people. Hope this helped=)
User Orhan
by
8.3k points
1 vote

The correct answer is A) the protection granted by the Constitution.

The other options of the question were B) the intention of the writers of the Constitution. C) the list of rights in the first ten amendments. D) the human rights safe from government intervention.

In Griswold v. Connecticut, justice Goldberg based his concurring opinion on the protection granted by the Constitution.

We are talking about the Supreme Court case decided on June 7, 1965. In the decision, justice Goldberg supported his arguments on the 9th amendment and the 14th amendment to the United States Constitution. He was joined by justices Brennan and Warren.

User Pepe
by
8.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.