Question

Do you think the advantages of paying tribute to the barbary pirates outweighed the disadvantages

Answer 1

Whether the benefits of paying tribute to the Barbary pirates outweighed the disadvantages depends on the historical context and impacts, such as immediate safety for ships versus financial costs and national pride. The U.S. ultimately waged war to stop such payments, valuing national honor and autonomy over temporary safety and expense.

Step-by-step explanation:

To evaluate whether the benefits of paying tribute to the Barbary pirates outweighed the disadvantages, we need to consider both the historical context and the specific impacts of these payments. Paying tribute could be seen as a short-term solution, preventing immediate harm and ensuring safe passage for ships. However, it also could suggest weakness, potentially encouraging more piracy. Furthermore, payment of tributes was a significant financial burden and arguably could undermine national pride and autonomy.

For example, the United States faced this dilemma in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Paying tribute to the Barbary states allowed American merchant ships to navigate the Mediterranean without being captured or plundered, which was crucial for trade. However, these payments were expensive and seen by many as extortion, leading to a loss of prestige and the eventual decision to wage war—the First Barbary War followed by the Second Barbary War—to end the tributes and protect national honor and commerce.

Answer 2

Yes, I think the advantages of paying tribute to the barbary pirates outweighed the disadvantages.

Compared to the maritime power of a kingdom, the power that held by the pirates at that time were relatively strong.

If the traders who want to pass want to ensure the safety of of their goods, they need to hire a group of mercenaries to accompany them.

The cost of mercenaries could even be higher compared to the tribute that required by the pirates.