Question

Solomon asch reported that individuals conformed to a group's judgment of the lengths of lines

a. only when members of the group were friends prior to the experiment.
b. even when the group seemed uncertain and repeatedly altered its judgment.
c. only when the group was composed of at least six members.
d. even when the group judgment was clearly incorrect.
e. only when the group was composed exclusively of males.

Answer 1

d. even when the group judgment was clearly incorrect.

Step-by-step explanation:

Solomon Asch performed a series of experiments that are known by the generic name "the Asch experiment". This is a series of surveys conducted in 1951 whose main purpose was to prove that people submit to the power of the group, adopting a compliance attitude towards it.

The experiment basically consisted of forming a group of 7 to 9 students. All but one were part of the experiment and were accomplices of the researcher. A few lines were shown to all of them, and the researcher asked each to indicate which line was longer. The correct answer was very evident, but the accomplices begin one by one to speak the option that was noticeably smaller as if it were the correct option. This made the subject being actually evaluated - the only one who was not an accomplice - feel strong pressure from the group to respond.

In this experiment Asch reported that individuals were in agreement with a group's judgment of line length even when the group's judgment was clearly incorrect.

Answer 2

The answer from the given options is "d. even when the group judgment was clearly incorrect."

The judgments that are made by a gathering likewise have a tendency to join. The exemplary adaptation of this conformity impact originates from examines by Solomon Asch initially directed in the 1950s. Members were individuals from a gathering or group who were judging the length of lines. On a few trials, the gathering made judgments that weren't right by a substantial edge. At the point when members judged the length of that line again later on, they for the most part one-sided their judgment toward the gathering, despite the fact that they thought the gathering was likely wrong.