57.0k views
4 votes
John Baker likes to put graffiti on walls in his neighborhood although he was warned once by the police to stop. The graffiti involves offensive language, but he believes it is a form of self-expression.

User Chaviva
by
6.0k points

2 Answers

0 votes

Answer:

Responses will vary. A sample response follows: Even though John has a good reason behind his graffiti (he believes it is a form of artistic expression), he has to realize that his actions are not characteristic of a good citizen for several reasons. First, he is not respecting authority or obeying the law. He has been warned once and knows that the law says he is not allowed to put graffiti on any public or private property (unless it is his own). Secondly, if his language is offensive, he is not respecting the citizens around him and is therefore not concerned with the greater good.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps :) (dont copy the ) "Responses will vary. A sample response follows:"

User Freelancer
by
6.4k points
6 votes
The basic principle in the exercise of one's right is that it should not interfere with the ability of others to enjoy their rights as well. this means rights have limitations, and these limitations are logical. The graffiti hurted the neighbour and that is a violation of his rights of propert as well.
User Eduardohl
by
6.2k points