menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Uranium-235 has a half-life of 713 million years. Would uranium-235 or carbon-14 be more useful for dating a fossil from Precambrian Time? Explain.
asked
Jan 21, 2019
97.8k
views
2
votes
Uranium-235 has a half-life of 713 million years. Would uranium-235 or carbon-14 be more useful for dating a fossil from Precambrian Time? Explain.
Social Studies
college
Aaswad Satpute
asked
by
Aaswad Satpute
8.4k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
3
votes
Uranium-235 would be more useful because it has a longer half life.
Rick Bowerman
answered
Jan 27, 2019
by
Rick Bowerman
8.3k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.5m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
In the peaceful period of the Middle Kingdom, what area of culture thrived?
Why did the slogan Peace Land and Bread appeal to the Russian people?
Which city was located nearest the nile river delta
''Life in a city is more rewarding than life outside a city."List two or three arguments in favor of this opinion and two or three arguments opposing this opinion
What are the advantages and disadvantages of globalization
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org