48.2k views
5 votes
John says the transformation rule (x, y) --> (x + 4, y + 7) can be used to describe the slide of the pre-image (4, 5) to the image (0, –2). What was his error?

2 Answers

7 votes

Answer:


The pre-image is the point you start with. To check the transformation rule, substitute the values of the coordinates (4, 5) into the rule. You get (4, 5) → (4+4, 5+7). Simplify to get (4, 5) → (8, 12). This is the image. Instead the rule was applied to the image. This is the source of the error.

User Abul
by
8.1k points
6 votes
For this case we have the following transformation:
(x, y) -> (x + 4, y + 7)
The ordered pair to which the transformation is applied is:
(x, y) = (4, 5)
Therefore, applying the transformation we have:
(4, 5) -> (4 + 4, 5 + 7) -----> (8, 12)
The error for this case is that John made the following transformation:
(4, 5) -> (4 - 4, 5 - 7) -----> (0, -2)
That is, rest the numbers instead of adding.
Answer:
his error was subtract instead of adding.
The correct answer is:
(8, 12)
User David Makovoz
by
9.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories