112k views
4 votes
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary sources for historians

A) they cant offer historians firsthand interpretation of an important event
B) they can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool
C) they can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered
D) they can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived

Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary-example-1

1 Answer

1 vote
C--they provide a general summary historians have discovered

Secondary sources are historical textbooks or non-fiction writing. They include generalized historical facts accepted by most historians. They can also contain bias of events and should still be read with a critical eye.
User Michiel Van Dijk
by
8.2k points

Related questions

asked Dec 25, 2024 227k views
Bjaksic asked Dec 25, 2024
by Bjaksic
8.5k points
1 answer
3 votes
227k views
asked Dec 9, 2024 17.6k views
Sundeep Gupta asked Dec 9, 2024
by Sundeep Gupta
8.0k points
1 answer
2 votes
17.6k views
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.