72.7k views
4 votes
Whole numbers are written on cards and then placed in a bag. Pilar selects a single card, writes down the number, and then places it back in the bag. She repeats this 46 times.

Pilar calculates the relative frequency of each number card.

Outcome 1 2 3 4 5
Relative Frequency 0.05 0.35 0.26 0.13 0.21
Which statement about Pilar's experiment is true?


The outcomes do not appear to be equally likely, so a uniform probability model is not a good model to represent probabilities in Pilar's experiment.

The outcomes appear to be equally likely, so a uniform probability model is not a good model to represent probabilities in Pilar's experiment.

The outcomes do not appear to be equally likely, so a uniform probability model is a good model to represent probabilities in Pilar's experiment.

The outcomes appear to be equally likely, so a uniform probability model is a good model to represent probabilities in Pilar's experiment.

User Pickles
by
8.1k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

Option 1

The outcomes do not appear to be equally likely, so a uniform probability model is not a good model to represent probabilities in Pilar's experiment.

Explanation:

Given :

The outcomes are : 1 2 3 4 5

The Relative Frequency : 0.05 0.35 0.26 0.13 0.21

To find : Which statement about Pilar's experiment is true?

Solution :

We can see the outcomes do not appear to be equally likely.

Since 0.05 and 1 are not close in number range along with the other options.

So, The outcomes do not appear to be equally likely.

Uniform probability model - A model in which every outcome has equal probability.

But in given case, Probabilities in Pilar's experiment does not support a uniform probability model.

So, A uniform probability model is not a good model to represent probabilities in Pilar's experiment.

Therefore, Option 1 is correct.

User Nazar Sakharenko
by
8.4k points
3 votes

Answer:

The answer is A (i just took the test)

Explanation:

Answer: The outcomes do not appear to be equally likely, so a uniform probability model is not a good model to represent probabilities in Pilar's experiment

The outcomes are: 1 2 3 4 5

The Relative Frequency: 0.05 0.35 0.26 0.13 0.21

As you can see the outcomes do not appear to be equally likely since 0.05 and 1 are not close in number range along with the other options

User Saswata
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.