161k views
0 votes
Martin says the area of a tile with a length of 1 foot by a width of 1 foot has an area of 1 square foot. And, to find 1 2 12 of this area, he would need to find 1 2 12 of the width and 1 2 12 of the length, and then multiply those two values. Unfortunately, his method is incorrect. Show at least one equation to show why this method would not work, and briefly state a method that will find 1 2 12 of 1 square foot.

User Anathema
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

The answer in the procedure

Explanation:

we know that

If two figures are similar. then the ratio of its areas is equal to the scale factor squared

In this problem we have a tile with a length of 1 foot by a width of 1 foot

The area of the tile is equal to


A=LW

substitute the values


A=(1)(1)=1\ ft^(2)

Let

z-------> the scale factor

x------> the area of 1/2 tile

y------> the area of the original tile

so


z^(2) =(x)/(y)

substitute


z^(2) =((1/2))/(1)


z=(√(2))/(2) -----> scale factor

therefore

To find the area of 1/2 tile must multiply the dimensions of the tile by the scale factor

so


L=1*(√(2))/(2)=(√(2))/(2)\ in


W=1*(√(2))/(2)=(√(2))/(2)\ in

Calculate the area


A=(√(2))/(2)*(√(2))/(2)=(1)/(2)\ ft^(2)

Martin's method is incorrect because to find the area of 1/2 tile, he multiplies the dimensions by 1/2

so


L=1*(1)/(2)=(1)/(2)\ in


W=1*(1)/(2)=(1)/(2)\ in

the area will be


A=(1)/(2)*(1)/(2)=(1)/(4)\ ft^(2)

User Elevener
by
7.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories