168k views
4 votes
Which is a pro-election of federal judges argument?

A. When judges are elected they can be biased by party politics.

B. When judges are elected there they can focus more time on reviewing law.

C. Judges are more accountable to the people and what they think is just when they are elected

User Septi
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

5 votes
The answer is C! I just answered this question for my school.
User Emilie Zawadzki
by
7.5k points
3 votes

''Judges are more accountable to the people and what they think is just when they are elected''. It is said to be the pro-election of federal judges argument.

Answer: Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

A federal judge is appointed by the president and is appointed to the federal court. The primary work of these judges is to resolve matters and issues brought before the federal courts with the full and fair use of the constitution. They are also permitted to hear various criminal and civilian cases.

The judges are more accountable to the people than any other party or division of the government. What they think is just when they are elected. This is a pro-election argument of the federal judge.

User HermitCrab
by
7.8k points

No related questions found