Final answer:
Harriet Jacobs resolved her internal conflict by resisting her master's sexual advances, gaining a sense of autonomy, which also influenced the external conflict by challenging the oppression of slavery and setting a precedent for defiance.
Step-by-step explanation:
Harriet Jacobs resolved one of her internal conflicts by choosing to resist her master's sexual advances, thereby asserting a form of self-autonomy in a situation that allowed for very little personal control. This decision is significant because it addresses the profound moral struggle she faced as an enslaved woman, where her choice represented one of several abnormal responses to her circumstances. Jacobs's resistance to sexual abuse and her determination to love whom she pleased can also be seen as a form of internal conflict resolution, suggesting that she found "something akin to freedom" in making these choices.
Regarding the external conflict, Jacobs's resistance had a profound effect. It challenged the oppressive power dynamics of slavery that normalized sexual violence as a form of terrorism and control. By denying her master's attempts to control her body, she not only rejected his power over her but also set an example of defiance that could inspire others. Her actions reflect the broader conflict between enslaved individuals' desire for autonomy and the relentless dehumanization by slaveholders.