Question

AHOII THERE!!!

Anyone willing to help me, i'd greatly appreciate it?????
I have to write a letter, and this is what it has to contains..

A short essay of 2–3 paragraphs, in which you evaluate the soundness, relevance, and sufficiency of your reasoning and support in your letter. Are you confident that your audience will be convinced of your argument? Why? Which reasons or pieces of evidence are the most compelling and convincing? How exactly did you appeal to your readers' sense of logic or emotions?

Could someone plx navigate me on how to do all of it?

Answer 1

Answer:What do you think about zoo captivity. This topic is very important to me because i think that it is very unfair to take animals away from their homes and put them into exhibits. Animals deserve to live in their own homes with packs, pods, or whatever they call their family. This is unfair to them.

the purpose, or goal of this letter, is to help the animals in the zoo. They have been taking away from their homes, their family, and their ability to freedom. Often animals look unhappy in zoos. Some Zoos treat their animals well, and others really don’t, but either way, you take their ability to live their lives. I think his topic has to be addressed.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

This 'short essay' is basically asking you create a piece of writing, convincing your audience of your point. For example; I firmly believe that every single country should not have nuclear bombs. In general, I'd include:

*Nuclear Bomb Simulator to give an image I how much damage it does. What this does is, people tend to hate destructive behaviours. By showing them how much damage it does, you're appealing to their sense of emotion by conjuring a sense of panic.

*Death counts from previous wars to further reinforce the emotion of panic, sadness, and awareness. Death count for those individuals who demand solid scientific evidence.

In a nutshell, basically, include statistics (supports your argument with logical data that's already proven), history from past events if possible (to appeal to one's emotions), and if possible, choose evidence that's more modernized to further prove your point. Why so? Simply because it proves that the problem still persists, no matter how advanced in technology we are. in this case, nuclear bombs are going to be dangerous, regardless of how "modernized" we all are.