110k views
3 votes
What reason does Hunter offer that supports his central claim that voting should be compulsory in the United States?

A. Leaders would be required to appeal to the wealthiest citizens of the United States.

B. Leaders would have to offer incentives in order to get the public to vote for them.

C. Leaders would be judged by their ideas instead of their ability to stir up controversy.

D. Leaders would need the support of the people within their political party to get elected.

2 Answers

4 votes
I think c but I’m not 100% sure
User Jirimertin
by
5.1k points
5 votes

Answer:

C. Leaders would be judged by their ideas instead of their ability to stir up controversy.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hunter claims that more people, regardless of economic status, would be able to offer opinions on important issues.

User Steve Park
by
5.7k points