179k views
4 votes
How is historical evidence useful to a historian?

A. It prevents a historian from relying on historiography.
B. It allows a historian to think chronologically.
C. It can help a historian avoid detecting bias in a source.
D. It can support a historian's conclusions.

2 Answers

2 votes
I believe D because the more facts or evidence they know they can make conclusions about what happened next and later on get thier answer.
User ConnectionLost
by
5.3k points
6 votes

Answer:

D. It can support a historian's conclusions.

Step-by-step explanation:

History provides the only rational means of investigating the past. This statement is based in part on the concept of evidence development in the history (and handling techniques) of evidence. There has been a great deal of discussion about historical evidence and its importance for the study of history in recent years. What is important to the subject at hand is that if the use of evidence is what somehow makes a rational investigation of the past possible, using evidence to support a historian's conclusions.

User Tadija
by
5.4k points