Question

Pros and cons of placing term limits on supreme court justices?

Answer 1

Term limits on Supreme Court justices have both advantages and disadvantages. They bring fresh perspectives and increase diversity, but may result in a loss of experience and increased political influence. The decision to implement term limits should be carefully considered.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Pros and Cons of Placing Term Limits on Supreme Court Justices

Advantages:

1. Fresh Perspective: Term limits can bring new ideas and perspectives to the Supreme Court, as new justices are appointed and retired regularly.
2. Reduced Partisanship: Term limits can help decrease the influence of political parties and reduce the likelihood of justices making decisions based on political biases.
3. Increased Diversity: Placing term limits can promote diversity by creating opportunities for justices from different backgrounds, including women, minorities, and individuals with unconventional occupations.

Disadvantages:

1. Lack of Experience: Term limits may result in the loss of experienced justices who have developed a deep understanding of constitutional law and the complexities of the court system.
2. Instability: Frequent turnover due to term limits can lead to an unpredictable court system, as justices may lack sufficient time to fully understand and assess complex cases.
3. Political Influence: Term limits may make justices more susceptible to political pressures, as they may be more concerned about their future careers rather than impartially interpreting the law.

Overall, term limits on Supreme Court justices have both advantages and disadvantages. While they can bring fresh perspectives and increase diversity, they may also result in a loss of experience and increased political influence. The decision to implement term limits should be carefully considered, weighing these factors.

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Pros:

1. Judges Of All Ages Might Be Nominated. With term limits, age wouldn't be such an issue and named justices could even have more experience.

2. It also, will avoid the nomination judges working beyond 80's,beyond the point of being able to do the job.

3. No Politically Motivated Retirements

Cons:

1.term limits could change the way the public thinks about the court, making them connect it more with elections rather than seeing it as independent.

2. More Money & Lack Of Independence.

3. Real problem is not addressed. One activist judge passing the baton to another does not create a check on judicial activism