136k views
2 votes
What is the square root of 2

1 Answer

3 votes

√(2) is, well,
√(2). It's what's called an irrational number, which means that it can't be written as the ratio of two integers (i.e. numbers like 3/5, 8/13, 256/689), though I might as well take this time to go into one of my favorite proofs. I'm going to show you why it's impossible to write
√(2) as a fraction, and we're going to start by assuming that it is possible.

Proof:
√(2) is irrational.

Assume
√(2) is rational. If
√(2) is rational, it must be able to be written as the ratio of two integers - let's call them p and q -
(p)/(q). Let's assume that
(p)/(q) is in simplest form; we can't reduce it any more.

We know that
√(2)= (p)/(q), which means that, squaring both sides:


2 = \big( (p)/(q)\big)^2


2= (p^2)/(q^2)

Multiplying both sides by
q^2, our equation becomes:


2q^2=p^2

Since this shows that
p^2 is a multiple of 2, we know that p is even, since squaring it gives us another even number.

Any even number is just 2 multiplied by some integer - let's call that integer k - so we can say that, since p is even:


p = 2k

Plugging that back in, we get:


2q^2=(2k)^2

Expanding the right side:


2q^2=4k^2

And dividing both sides by 2:


q^2 = 2k^2

So
q^2 is even, which means that q is even, too. But wait, what did we say at the beginning?

"Let's assume that
(p)/(q) is in simplest form; we can't reduce it any more."

But, since both p and q are even, we can reduce our fraction by dividing p and q by 2, so we just contradicted ourselves! Since we assumed something was true, and following a completely logical set of steps made it come out false, we know that our assumption was wrong! So,


√(2) is irrational.

End of story. Or, as mathematicians tend to say it, Q.E.D. (Quod erat demonstrandum - "which was to be demonstrated")
User Cesss
by
5.6k points