Question

An article noted that chocolate is rich in flavonoids. the article reports that​ "regular consumption of foods rich in flavonoids may reduce the risk of coronary heart​ disease." the study received funding from a candy company and a chocolate manufacturers association. identify and explain at least one source of bias in the study described. then suggest how the bias might have been avoided.

Answer 1

Potential bias in the flavonoid study could stem from its funding by a candy company and a chocolate manufacturers association, which could be mitigated by independent funding and peer review.

Step-by-step explanation:

The study suggesting that regular consumption of foods rich in flavonoids, such as chocolate, may reduce the risk of coronary heart disease has a potential source of bias due to its funding by a candy company and a chocolate manufacturers association. This financial support may lead to biased outcomes that favor the interests of the sponsors. To avoid such a bias, the study could have been funded by an independent organization with no vested interest in the results. Moreover, the research methodology should be transparent, and the study should undergo peer review by experts in the field who do not have a conflict of interest.

Answer 2

since ancient times, chocolate has long been used as a medicinal remedy and been proposed in medicine today for preventing various chronic diseases, while chocolates has also sometimes been criticized for its saturated fat contant, mostly in the form of long-chain stearic acid, chocolate has also been lauded for its antioxidant potential.However to this date there are no long-term randomized feeding trials of chocolate to assess effects on actual cardiovascular events.