Option A: establishes that the diagonals intersect at right angles, which is a property of a rhombus, but not sufficient. Conclusion of "no" is incorrect.
Option B: establishes that the diagonals intersect at right angles, which is a property of a rhombus, but not sufficient.
Option C: establishes that the diagonals bisect each other, which is a property of a rhombus, but not sufficient.
Option D: establishes that the diagonals intersect at right angles, which is a property of a rhombus, AND diagonals bisect each other. Together, the two properties are sufficient to establish that the figure is a rhombus.
Another sufficient condition to establish a rhombus is that the four sides are congruent, as follows:
If A(2, −1), B(5, −5), C(10, −5), and D(7, −1) are the vertices of a rhombus IN ORDER, then AB, BC, CD, DA are the sides.
It is sufficient to prove that the four sides are congruent to conclude that ABCD is a rhombus. (can be established by joining diagonals and proving congruence of triangles by SSS).
mAB=sqrt((5-2)^2+(-5-(-1))^2)=sqrt(3^2+4^2)=5
similarly,
mBC=sqrt(5^2+0)=5
mCD=sqrt(3^2+4^2)=5
mDA=sqrt(5^2+0)=5
Since all four sides are congruent, the figure is a rhombus.