menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Question of ethics agreement to arbitrate should a person with limited mental capacity be held to the arbitration clause agreed to by the next-of-kin who signed on behalf of that person? why or why not?
asked
Mar 28, 2019
152k
views
0
votes
Question of ethics agreement to arbitrate should a person with limited mental capacity be held to the arbitration clause agreed to by the next-of-kin who signed on behalf of that person? why or why not?
Social Studies
college
Enrico Susatyo
asked
by
Enrico Susatyo
7.4k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
3
votes
The answer to this statement is yes. It is because a person with limited mental capacity should be granted of arbitration clause by the next of kin who signed of the behalf of the person because of the fact that the individual is mentally disabled.
Awiseman
answered
Apr 2, 2019
by
Awiseman
8.2k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.5m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
Who was the boy who became king at the age of 9?
In the peaceful period of the Middle Kingdom, what area of culture thrived?
Why did the slogan Peace Land and Bread appeal to the Russian people?
Why wasn't New England's land well-suited for farming
What are the advantages and disadvantages of globalization
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org