Register
Question of ethics agreement to arbitrate should a person with limited mental capacity be held to the arbitration clause agreed to by the next-of-kin who signed on behalf of that person? why or why not?
152k views
0 votes
Question of ethics agreement to arbitrate should a person with limited mental capacity be held to the arbitration clause agreed to by the next-of-kin who signed on behalf of that person? why or why not?

User Enrico Susatyo
by
4.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes
The answer to this statement is yes. It is because a person with limited mental capacity should be granted of arbitration clause by the next of kin who signed of the behalf of the person because of the fact that the individual is mentally disabled.
User Awiseman
by
5.3k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

6.0m questions

7.9m answers

Other Questions

Which type of anxiety plays a key role in many cases of erectile dysfunction?
To truly understand why people act the way they do, we must understand the meanings they attach to their behaviors. max weber called this:
Mr. Jensen repeatedly complains about the quality and duration of his sleep. He claims that he has difficulty falling asleep and staying asleep, and that he usually wakes up before it is time to get up.
Those rights that are so fundamental that they are outside of the authority of government to refulate are known as
Does the president of israel make all the decisions and rules for the country
Link Copied!