Question

In at least 150 words, compare the effectiveness of the U.S. government in meeting the needs of citizens to that of another form of government?

Answer 1

The U.S. government falls in the middle of the spectrum, advocating for limited government while providing fundamental services like law and order, education, and health care. In contrast, other countries range from extensive service provisions like in Sweden to minimal government involvement like parts of New Guinea and North Korea's highly regulated system.

Step-by-step explanation:

The effectiveness of a government in meeting the needs of its citizens can vary greatly depending on the system in place. In the United States, the federal form of government emphasizes a balance between a centralized national authority and state's rights, which allows for a diverse array of policies and services tailored to the constituents of each state. These services include law and order, education, old-age pensions, and health care through programs like Social Security and Medicare.

Comparatively, other forms of government like Sweden's offer extensive cradle-to-grave services, significantly reducing the personal responsibility for individual well-being. Contrastingly, in countries like North Korea, the government is heavily involved in regulating its citizens' lives, often at the expense of personal freedoms. There are also examples like parts of New Guinea and Egypt where the government's role is minimal, with services often provided by the non-profit sector or not at all.

The U.S. government falls somewhere in the middle of this spectrum. It espouses the principles of limited government and freedom but provides a foundation of services intended to support and protect its citizens. The ability to meet the needs of its citizens is, therefore, a balancing act between intervention and autonomy, making its effectiveness dependent on citizens' diverse expectations and the government's response to their needs.

Answer 2

Numerous nations today claim to be people oriented and democratic based systems, however in the event that the subjects are not associated with government and legislative issues, they are just in name as it were. To some a larger extent the United States have always proven to be an exemplary country with the few points listed below:
The right to speak freely: If it were in other countries CNN would not have the kind of freedom to even show events as they relate to the white house and senate ,the press, and religion. US permits total opportunity for the press to be free and fair for and also for people to air their grievances , however majority rules systems don't intensely edit daily papers and open articulation of feelings.
Lion's share control with minority rights. In popular governments, individuals ordinarily acknowledge choices made by the greater part of voters in a free decision. Nonetheless, vote based systems attempt to dodge the "oppression of the dominant part" by giving approaches to minorities different sorts to have their voices heard also. USA shows a leadership in this regard
Changed individual foundations of political pioneers. Vote based systems more often than not leave space for a wide range of sorts of subjects to go after administration positions. As it were, presidents and officials don't all originate from a couple of tip top families, a similar piece of the nation, or a similar social class. USA sets the stage for a totally transparency with regards to this
Free & fair elections. The nearness of decisions alone isn't sufficient to call a nation a majority rule government. The decisions must be reasonable and aggressive, and the administration or political pioneers can't control the outcomes. Voters must have genuine options among applicants who keep running for open office and from time to time its always been fight free.
Judiciary rule book . Majority rules systems are not controlled by the impulses of a pioneer, but rather they are represented by laws that apply to pioneers and residents similarly. Everything in the USA is according to law
How much an administration satisfies these criteria is how much it can be viewed as fair. USA have shown all the qualities to be called a truly democratic society , even if there are flaws, it's still leading when compared to how other countries are being run and leaders elected. Rule of fairness made President Donald trump to become the president because if he was judged out of the rule book, he would not have been given the chance in the first place to run.