155k views
3 votes
John Ruskin in his essay "Work," claims that doctors value curing the sick more than money, and offers the following reason in support of his claim. [Doctors] in the whole, desire to cure the sick; and-if they are good doctors, and the choice were fairly put to them- would rather cure their patient and lose their fee than kill him and get it. Which best evaluates the support Ruskin offers for his claim?

A. it is logical; most people don't want to become doctors just for the sake of money

B. it s logical; most people-- not just doctors-- would choose to save a life rather than kill someone and be paid

C. its not logical; the author ignores other possibilities that the patient is cured and the doctor still gets his fee for example

D. it is not logical; the author himself is not a doctor, so he does not have the expertise necessary to qualify his opinion.

User Alexey Vol
by
4.9k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

C. its not logical; the author ignores other possibilities that the patient is cured and the doctor still gets his fee for example

Step-by-step explanation:

hiiiiii

User Proudgeekdad
by
5.5k points
2 votes

the answer is C. its not logical; the author ignores other possibilities that the patient is cured and the doctor still gets his fee for example.

hope this helped let me know if you got it right

User Tom Minka
by
5.4k points