Question

Explain the relationship between the 5th and 6th amendment and miranda v. Arizona .Cite evidence from the text in your response.

Answer 1

The relationship between the 5th and 6th Amendments and the Miranda v. Arizona case is that the case affirmed and expanded upon the rights protected by these amendments.

Step-by-step explanation:

The relationship between the 5th and 6th Amendments and the Miranda v. Arizona case is that the case affirmed and expanded upon the rights protected by these amendments. The 5th Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination, while the 6th Amendment guarantees the right to have an attorney present during questioning by the police.

In the Miranda v. Arizona case, the Supreme Court ruled that statements obtained during custodial interrogations cannot be used as evidence unless the suspect has been properly informed of their rights. These rights, known as Miranda rights, include the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present. The Miranda warning, which informs suspects of these rights, was established as a result of this case and is now a standard practice in police questioning.

Answer 2

I only know a little bit about it, so the fifth amendment is the right to remain silent, Miranda rights and double jeopardy. while the six amendment it right to a speedy trial with jury for criminal cases. In that case Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping an 18 year old, they took him in without telling him his rights which means that he did not know he could remain silent, they made him talk but since they did not tell him his civil rights he won the case. Which created the Miranda rights. Now double jeopardy means that they can't accuse him of the same crime. That's all I know and I hope this helps a little, I can't cite anything cause I got this off my government teacher.