Carroll v. US main idea is to permit a warrantless search of a car in the presence of a probable cause, attending to the fact that the vehicle can be removed from the area before a search warrant is obtained.
At DLK case the big discussion is if the Fourth Amendment has any exceptions in the case of search warrants, because we are talking again about a case that evolves the concept of “searching” itself in light of new technologic developments.
At DLK case the decission that thermal imaging of a home doesn’t constitute a search is a strong legal precedent to argument that if in the future thecnology can create sophisticated equipements to invade one’s right to privacy, the fourth amendment can still protect citizens against them.