Question

A consumer group invests in a national campaign touting the health advantages of eating chicken. Which of the following statements best identifies a potential negative externality?

A. Cattle ranchers lose property rights to grazing land.
B. Chickens cease to be household pets.
C. Poultry farms produce more chicken waste.
D. Vegetarians see fewer health benefits than before

Answer 1

The statement that vegetarian will see fewer health benefits than before is best identify a potential negative externalize in regard of campaigning touting the health benefits of eating chickens.

Step-by-step explanation:

The positive statement released by the campaigners about the advantages of eating chicken will adversely affect the mentally of vegetarians as they found their vegetarian diet less healthy in terms of eating chicken.

The vegetarian consumers will compare health benefits of eating veggies to eating chickens and this will somewhere increase the consumption rate of chickens.

Answer 2

The correct answer is C.

The goal of a campaign is to raise awareness about a specific product or idea. In this case, the idea is to encourage the population to eat more chicken. People should start to associate chicken with health and they should develop positive associations with this type of meat. When they hear the word 'waste', they automatically assume that something is not good or of poor quality. Therefore, it is better to avoid any words or phases that invoke negative thoughts or comments even if they are harmless in reality.