69.8k views
2 votes
Which explains whether or not the graph represents a direct variation?

Which explains whether or not the graph represents a direct variation?-example-1
User Workman
by
6.7k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:A

Explanation:

Boom that’s it

User Mgiagnoni
by
6.1k points
5 votes

Answer:

a. The graph has a constant of variation of 3, so it represents a direct variation.

Explanation:

We have been given a graph and we are asked to find whether our given graph represents direct variation or not.

Since we know that a direct variation is an equation in slope-intercept form, which passes through origin (0,0) and constant of variation equals to the slope of the line.

Direct variation equation is in form:
y=kx, where k= constant of variation.

Slope intercept equation of line is in form:
y=mx+b, where m= slope and b= y-intercept.

Let us find equation of our given line in slope-intercept form.

We can see from our given graph that our line passes through the origin, so y-intercept (b) equals zero.

Let us find slope of our given line.


m=(y_2-y_1)/(x_2-x_1)


m=(3-0)/(1-0)


m=(3)/(1)=3

Upon substituting m=3 and b=0 in slope intercept form of equation we will get:
y=3x+0. Upon comparing our line with direct variation equation we can see that k=3, therefore, option a is the correct choice.


User Partik
by
6.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.