162k views
1 vote
explain how muller v oregon represented a victory for women reformers during the progressive era but presented a setback for them in later years

1 Answer

2 votes

The aim of the Muller v. State of Oregon case was to improve the working conditions for women. The government ended up passing a law that protected them from being exploited by setting a limit of 10 hours of work per day for women.

This made sense at the time and did in fact represent a win for women reformers, but the "protection" granted to them would ultimately represent a limitation to their economic growth. In addition, these "protective" laws pushed a reinforcement of gender stereotypes that later would set women back in their fight for equal rights.


Hope this helps!

User Alex Quinto
by
6.7k points