162k views
1 vote
explain how muller v oregon represented a victory for women reformers during the progressive era but presented a setback for them in later years

1 Answer

2 votes

The aim of the Muller v. State of Oregon case was to improve the working conditions for women. The government ended up passing a law that protected them from being exploited by setting a limit of 10 hours of work per day for women.

This made sense at the time and did in fact represent a win for women reformers, but the "protection" granted to them would ultimately represent a limitation to their economic growth. In addition, these "protective" laws pushed a reinforcement of gender stereotypes that later would set women back in their fight for equal rights.


Hope this helps!

User Alex Quinto
by
8.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.