228k views
1 vote
A local government hiring contractors to complete a building project might not always choose the lowest bidder. Which of these is a legitimate reason for this?

User Koszikot
by
4.7k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

One reason is to ensure quality and expertise, while another reason is to support local businesses and the economy.

Step-by-step explanation:

One legitimate reason why a local government hiring contractors for a building project might not always choose the lowest bidder is to ensure quality and expertise. While the lowest bidder may offer a cheaper price, they may not have the necessary skills, experience, or resources to complete the project effectively. By selecting a contractor based on their qualifications rather than just the price, the government can ensure that the project is done correctly and meets the necessary standards.

For example, if a government is constructing a complex infrastructure project like a bridge or a hospital, they would need a contractor with specific expertise and a proven track record in that area. Choosing the lowest bidder without considering their qualifications could result in subpar construction or costly mistakes.

Another reason is to support local businesses and the local economy. By prioritizing local contractors, the government can stimulate the local economy and create job opportunities. This can benefit the community by keeping the money within the area and promoting economic growth.

User Amol Sonawane
by
6.0k points
0 votes

The contractors might have a low price but they are equipped with the expertise and materials to complete a job.

User Joe Mayo
by
4.8k points