Final answer:
Constitutionalism in England evolved through historic documents like the Magna Carta, limiting monarch power and establishing due process, whereas Dutch constitutionalism involved a decentralized approach with the Union of Utrecht and a confederation of provinces each having its own constitution.
Step-by-step explanation:
The difference between constitutionalism in England and the Netherlands pertains to the historical evolution and application of constitutional principles that limit the power of the government and protect individual rights. In England, constitutionalism evolved through a series of historic documents and events, including the Magna Carta of 1215, which established principles of due process and limited the power of the monarch.
This tradition was further developed through the English Civil War, the Glorious Revolution, and the establishment of the Bill of Rights in 1689, which collectively ensured that the monarchy could not rule without the consent of Parliament. In contrast, the Netherlands, which had a history of resistance to Spanish rule, formalized its constitutionalism with the Union of Utrecht in 1579 and the Dutch Republic, which represented a confederation of independent provinces, each with its own constitution. This decentralized nature of Dutch constitutionalism reflected a more collective approach to governance and a commercial society with significant mercantile freedoms.