Final answer:
Chan should address the issue by politely intervening, setting ground rules, and encouraging all members to contribute equally. If necessary, he could speak with those dominating the conversation privately to promote a more inclusive environment.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Chan finds that a few participants are dominating the discussion in his university group, he should take proactive steps to ensure that discussion remains balanced and inclusive. One effective method is to intervene politely and remind the group about the importance of hearing everyone's perspective. Chan can suggest a round-robin approach where each participant is given a set amount of time to speak or he can pose questions directly to quieter members to encourage their participation.
Additionally, Chan can establish ground rules at the beginning of the discussion that encourage equal participation and set the expectation that interruptions should be minimized. Should the issue persist, talking to the dominant individuals privately after the session to address the issue can also be beneficial. Utilizing strategies that minimize conformity pressure and maximize collaborative decision-making can considerably improve the group dynamic.
Chan's goal is to guide the group towards constructive dialogue where everyone feels valued and is encouraged to contribute, thereby aligning with healthy principles of group work outlined by Solomon Asch's and sociological studies on group dynamics.